Making Copilot Studio agents ready for FINRA: pre-send review of customer communications
To prepare a Copilot Studio agent for FINRA review of customer communications, place a policy decision at the point where the agent's output becomes an outbound action, such as sending an email, a chat message or a document. At that point, classify the communication under Rule 2210, then allow, redact, block or escalate it to a registered principal. Retain the draft, the decision, the reviewer, any edits and the final sent content. Prompts and after-the-fact review alone do not enforce these requirements when the message leaves the firm.
- 1
Email send actions
Outbound messages and attachments to customers.
- 2
Chat responses and posts
Messages delivered through customer-facing chat channels.
- 3
Document delivery
Files shared or attached by the agent.
- 4
Chained automations
Any flow the agent triggers that ends in a customer-facing send.
- 5
1. Inventory send-capable actions
List every action the agent can use to send customer-facing content, and classify each by Rule 2210 category and whether prior principal approval is required.
- 6
2. Write policy rules tied to named obligations
Express fair and balanced content, material facts and qualifications, and sensitive-data handling as testable rules, each mapped to the obligation it supports.
- 7
3. Evaluate at the send step
Run the rules against the draft and the recipient and distribution context immediately before the action executes.
- 8
4. Apply one of four outcomes
Allow, redact, block or escalate, with each rule assigned a default outcome.
- 9
5. Route escalations to a registered principal
The reviewer approves, edits or rejects, and the send proceeds only after approval.
- 10
6. Retain the evidence record
Store the full record for the communication at the time of the decision, not reconstructed later.
Evidence a supervisory review should retain
- Original agent draft and the prompt that produced it
- Model version used and the time of generation
- Policy rules evaluated and the decision returned: allow, redact, block or escalate
- Reviewer identity and review date for escalated items
- Edits made, with the final content as actually sent
- Actions taken on significant regulatory issues identified in the review
What FINRA expects of AI-generated customer communications
FINRA describes its rules as technology neutral. Regulatory Notice 24-09 states that they apply to generative AI whether a tool is built in-house or provided by a third party, including embedded features in existing third-party products. A firm cannot treat a platform-provided agent as outside its supervisory obligations. FINRA also expects firms to evaluate GenAI tools before deployment.
Two rules do most of the work for customer communications. Rule 2210 defines communications as correspondence, retail communications and institutional communications. Correspondence is any written, including electronic, communication distributed or made available to 25 or fewer retail investors within any 30 calendar-day period. An appropriately qualified registered principal must approve each retail communication before the earlier of its use or its filing with FINRA's Advertising Regulation Department. Rule 2210 also requires content that is fair and balanced, based on fair dealing and good faith, and that includes the material facts or qualifications needed so it is not misleading. These standards apply regardless of medium.
Rule 3110(b)(4) requires supervisory procedures for review of incoming and outgoing written, including electronic, correspondence. A registered principal must conduct the review and evidence it in writing, electronically or on paper. Procedures must suit the firm's business, size, structure and customers, and firms apply risk-based principles to decide how much additional review is needed. This reflects FINRA's rules as of November 2026.
Defining allow, redact, block and escalate
Each outcome should be defined in policy before the agent goes live, with an owner and a rationale. The definitions below are a starting point. Firms set the thresholds based on their own business and risk assessment.
For messages that pass automated policy checks, the firm still has to decide how they fit its supervisory procedures. Under Rule 3110, risk-based principles determine the extent of review, so document why some categories are reviewed before sending and others are sampled afterward.
- Allow: Content meets policy, the category does not require prior principal approval, and the firm's supervisory procedures cover review of the communication. The decision is still recorded.
- Redact: The message is acceptable once sensitive customer or confidential firm data is removed. The record shows what was removed.
- Block: The content conflicts with a policy rule, such as misleading or promissory claims, or lacks a required disclosure that cannot be added automatically. Nothing is sent.
- Escalate: The communication needs a registered principal, for example because it is a retail communication requiring approval before use, or because the rules cannot settle the case.
Evaluating runtime enforcement, and where Trussed fits
A compliance or model risk team assessing any runtime approach should ask five questions. Can it act before the send executes, and which channels and tool calls does it cover? Does it produce allow, redact, block and escalate outcomes, with escalations routed to a registered principal and written evidence of review? Does the evidence record include the draft, decision, reviewer, edits, final content and date, and can it be exported for examiners? Where is it deployed, and what are its retention and data residency terms? How does it fit the firm's model risk management, technology governance and pre-deployment evaluation? Regulatory Notice 24-09 says that if GenAI is used within the supervisory system itself, policies should cover model risk management, data privacy and integrity, reliability and accuracy.
Trussed is runtime control for consequential AI. It enforces policy in the execution path of agent interactions and tool calls, with allow, redact, block, rate limit and escalate-for-human-approval outcomes, and it generates audit-ready evidence from that enforcement. It is deployed self-managed in the customer's cloud, with configurable retention and data residency. Enforcement applies to individual interactions and tool calls. Trussed has run continuously in production in a regulated enterprise for more than 18 months, and insurance is the regulated financial sector where it is deepest. Trussed does not provide FINRA certification and cannot guarantee compliance. The firm's supervisory system and its registered principals remain responsible for meeting FINRA requirements.
Pre-send control path for an agent communication
Draft
The agent produces customer-facing content.
Classify
Recipient and distribution context set the Rule 2210 category.
Decide
Policy returns allow, redact, block or escalate.
Approve
A registered principal reviews escalated items.
Retain
Draft, decision, reviewer, edits and final content are stored.
Review your agent's send path with an expert
Walk through your agent's outbound actions, map them to pre-send control points, and see how enforcement produces audit-ready evidence.
Explore Agent and Tool-Call Enforcement